Showing posts with label Scaling question. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scaling question. Show all posts

Monday, July 4, 2011

21 Solution-Focused Techniques

© 2011, Coert Visser

Several informal surveys have given an impression of the relative popularity of different solution-focused techniques. The following 21 techniques seem to belong to the most well-known and popular solution-focused techniques: scaling questions, the past success question, the preferred future question, the platform question, the exception seeking question, reframing, indirect compliments, the miracle question, summarizing in the words of the client, the what-is-better question, normalizing, the usefulness question, the observation question, the perspective change question, the coping question, the continuation question, the prediction suggestion, leapfrogging, and mutualizing. Below is a description of these techniques.


1. The scaling question: The technique of scaling questions originated more or less coincidentally when a client, in a second session with Steve de Shazer, answered to his question how he was doing: “I’ve almost reached 10 already!” de Shazer began to play with the idea of using numbers to describe one’s situation. This started the development of the scaling question used in solution-focused therapy. Today, scaling questions have developed into the most well known and most frequently used solution-focused techniques. Scaling questions are relatively easy to use and extremely versatile. Nowadays, many therapists, coaches and managers use them. Even many people who know little about the solution-focused approach know the scaling question.

2. The past success question: The past success question is the question when things have already been better and what made that possible. By asking this question the client may remember when he has already been able to cope with a problem or to solve it. Remembering one or more past successes is likely to increase the confidence and hopefulness of the client and usually helps the clients find ideas to take a step forward. Some examples of past success questions are: “When have things already been a bit better?”, “Have you ever been able to solve such a problem before?”, and “Have ever experienced a situation which is a bit like the situation you want to achieve?”

3. The preferred future question: This is one of the most essential types of solution-focused questions. It is the question with which the coach invites the client to describe how he or she would like the situation to become. The coach or therapist encourages the client patiently and curiously to vividly describe the preferred future, (or the 'desired situation'). The preferred future gets described in terms of concrete, positive results. A few ways in which the question can be posed are: “What does your preferred future look like?”, “How do you want your situation to become?”, “What would you like instead of the problem?”, and “How will you notice things will have become better?” When asking the preferred future question it helps to encourage clients so that they can build an image of their preferred future step by step. Usually a good sign is when clients begin to describe in positive terms what they themselves will do differently in that situation. When this happens their motivation and willingness to try out steps forward usually increases.

4. The platform question: The platform question helps to see the client what is already there. Examples are: “What have you already achieved?”, “What is already there?”, and “What has helped to bring you to your current position?”. By focusing on what has already been achieved, people usually get a different, more positive perspective both on their current situation (“It is not all bad!”) and on their future. Once they start looking at the glass as half full instead of half empty, they become more hopeful that they will be able to achieve their change goals.

5. The exception-seeking question: In solution-focused change, an assumption is that the intensity of problems fluctuates constantly. There will always have been situations in which the problem was less intense and when things were better. These situations are identified and analyzed because they will often help to find ideas to solve the problem. An example of how exception-seeking questions may be asked is: “Are there times when the problem does not happen? When was this? What was different? How did you make that happen?”

6. Reframing: With reframing the professional gives a positive twist to the words or actions of the client. He or she sees the positive meaning or intention in or behind the words of the client and highlights that. Insoo Kim Berg once explained the concept of reframing nicely: "Reframing is simply an alternate, usually a positive interpretation of troublesome behavior that gives a positive meaning to the client's interaction with those in her environment. It suggests a new and different way of behaving, freeing the client to alter behavior and making it possible to bring about changes while "saving face". As a result, the client sees her situation differently, and may even find solutions in ways that she did not expect."

7. Indirect compliments: Complimenting indirectly means inviting the other person through a question to describe what was good about what he or she has done and what has worked well. An example of an indirect compliment is: “Wow, how did you manage to finish that task so quickly?"). You might also call such kinds of questions ‘affirming questions’. It is also possible to include the perspective of other people in indirect compliments. An example may be: “What do your colleagues appreciate in how you work?” An advantage of complimenting through questions is that you activate the other person. Also, there is less chance that he or she will feel embarrassed or will turn down the compliment ("It was nothing special"). Instead, you challenge the other person and make him or her reflect (“Actually, how did I do that.... let's see.....?”).

8. The miracle question: Another solution-focused classic is the miracle question. The miracle question is a sequence of questions which invite the client to vividly describe a day after which the problem has miraculously disappeared. It goes like this: "Suppose our meeting is over, you go home, do whatever you planned to do for the rest of the day. And then, sometime in the evening, you get tired and go to sleep. And in the middle of the night, when you are fast asleep, a miracle happens and all the problems that brought you here today are solved just like that. But since the miracle happened over night nobody is telling you that the miracle happened. When you wake up the next morning, how are you going to start discovering that the miracle happened? ... What else are you going to notice? What else?" The miracle question in fact is a special case of the desired situation question. It often leads to hope, energy and ideas for steps forward.

9. Summarizing in the client’s words: Solution-focused professionals frequently summarize what clients have said while sticking to their choice of words (this is called language matching). Advantages are that the client will feel taken seriously. Also, it helps them and gives them some time to think about what more they should tell. After a summary, it is often not even necessary for the coach to ask a question because clients already know how they would like to proceed. Peter De Jong and Insoo Kim Berg give six important functions of solution-focused summaries: 1) The summary reassures the client that the SF practitioner was listening carefully, 2) The summary reassures the SF practitioner that he has heard the client accurately, 3) By using the client's words in the summary the SF practitioner shows respect for the client's frame of reference, 4) The summary (if done descriptively and in a spirit of openness) has the effect of inviting the client to say more (correct, revise or add), 5) The summary has the effect of putting the client in control of how to describe their experiences, and 6) The summary assists the SF practitioner in formulating the next question based on what the client has just revealed.

10. The what-is-better question: This is also one of the most frequently used solution-focused techniques. The what-is-better-question is mainly asked in follow-up coaching or therapy sessions (second and later sessions) with clients. The advantage of this type of' question is that it helps the client to focus on which progress has been made in the past period and on what has worked well. This usually has a motivating effect, often leads to more awareness of what works and to useful ideas about further steps forward.
Some people who first hear about what-is-better-question are first a bit reluctant about using this slightly strange question. They think it's a bit awkward (”Isn't it more normal to just ask how things are going?") and they fear their client may think the question is strange, too. Well... to be honest, the question is a bit strange indeed. But the thing about is .... it works amazingly well. The value of the answers to the 'What's better?' question is enhanced when you, as a coach, ask probing questions. You keep asking until the situation is described so concretely that is easy to see what happened, what was good about it and how the person has managed to accomplish it. Much more important, however, than that the coach understands this is that the client see this concretely. The questions of the coach are a tool to accomplishing this. The interesting thing with the 'What's better?' question is that you repeat it often ("What else is better?"). Usually you don't just ask it 1, 2, or 3 times, but rather 6, 7, or 8 times. The surprising thing often is that client indeed manage to mention as many examples as that (encouragement by the coach is important of course). Also, coaches are often surprised to find out that sometimes the most interesting examples of what's better are not the first or the second ones that are mentioned. Sometimes, already 6 examples have been mentioned and then, suddenly, the client mentions a very important improvement, also to his or her own surprise (”Gee, I forgot that has happened but it is actually really important."). On a video tape I once saw a client who mentioned something like 35 things that were better. While the conversation proceeded his smile got bigger and bigger.
You may wonder: "But what do you do when the answer is 'Nothing is better!' or 'I have no idea'?" Coaches who want to ask the 'What's better?' question are sometimes worried that their client will answer like that or that they may even say: "What is better? Nothing's better. Everything has gotten worse!” Or that they may be irritated about the 'strangeness' of the question. In answer to this, I like to say two things. One is that although these things may indeed happen, in the majority of the cases they tend not to happen. Most clients do need a few seconds and some encouragement but then, they actually started mentioning improvements.

11. Normalizing: One of the nice things about the solution-focused approach is that it has many subtle and effective techniques. One of them is normalizing. Normalizing is used to depathologize people’s concerns and present them instead as normal life difficulties. It helps people to calm down about their problem. It helps them realize they're not abnormal for having this problem. Other people in their situation might respond the same. This is important, because if they felt angry and they'd also feel their anger was pathological, they'd have two problems, their anger and the fact that they behaved pathological. That their behavior would be pathological would be a surplus problem to the original problem (the thing they were angry about). Normalizing helps to prevent this surplus problem from happening. By saying something like: "Of course, you're angry, I understand. It's normal to be angry right now." You can help people to relax and to move on relatively quickly beyond their anger.

12. The usefulness question: A question which is used a lot in solution-focused coaching is the so-called usefulness question (sometimes referred to as the useful-question). The purpose of this question (of course) is to make conversations as useful as possible for those involved. Solution-focused coaches use usefulness questions at the beginning of conversations, during conversations and at the end of conversations. At the beginning, of conversations questions like these can be used: “How can we make this conversation as useful as possible?”, “What do you want to come out of this conversation?”, and “How would you notice afterwards that this conversation has been worth your time?” During the conversation, questions like these can be used: “So far, has this conversation been useful to you?”, (if yes) “What was useful?”, “How was it useful?”, (if no) “What are your ideas about how we can make the conversation more useful?”, and “How can we make the remaining time as useful as possible?” At the end of the conversation, questions like these can be used: “Has this conversation been useful to you?”, and “How is what we talked about useful to you?”
By asking usefulness questions, it becomes easier for people to focus on what they want to come out of the sessions. By asking the question, they will remember their goals and linking the conversation to these goals. The question has an activating effect. By asking the question people will usually become actively involved in the conversation right away. The interesting thing is that the usefulness question can be applied just as well in one-on-one conversations as in group sessions.

13. Observation suggestions: When clients find it hard to identify examples of earlier successes or exceptions to the problem, observation suggestions can be applied. Here is an example of this intervention may be done: “Could you, between now and our next conversation, pay attention to situations in which things are a bit better? … When you notice that things are better, could pay close attention to what is different in that situation and to what you do different yourself? And could you make a note of what is different and what you do that helps so that we can talk about it, next time we meet?”. The observation task often has a surprisingly strong effect. The question makes them notice more consciously what goes right in their lives. Usually, this helps them become more optimistic and gain more confidence.

14. The perspective change question: A powerful and simple way to help people visualize how their situation will be different once their situation will have become better is the perspective change question. Essentially, this question is: ”How will other people notice things are better?” There are many different ways to phrase the question. Here are some examples: “How would our customers notice that we would have become more customer focused?”, “How will other colleagues notice that the conflict will be solved?”, “How would your manager notice this coaching is no longer necessary?”, and “How would our competitor notice that our company has become more competitive?” The perspective change question helps client to develop a broader view on themselves and their situation and to look more objectively so that they can build clearer goals.
Often, this type of question is also referred to as the relationship question. This name is especially relevant when the perspective of a significant other is used. When clients are asked to imagine how, for example, their partner would notice the difference the question usually strengthens the relationship with that person. By answering the question clients find it easier to view things from the perspective of the other person which helps to appreciate this perspective more. Also, clients come to appreciate the relationship with this person more.
Perspective change questions help clients to view themselves from a third-person perspective. There is some research indicates that doing this has a motivational impact.. When we picture ourselves acting in the third-person, performing the type of behavior we would like to perform, we see ourselves as an observer would. It helps to view ourselves as the kind of person who performs such behavior which increases the likelihood of engaging in that behavior.

15. The coping question: solution-focused professionals use a specific kind of question that works well when people are going through hard times and can barely find the energy to do something about their problems. This type of questions is called ‘the coping question.’. When normal strategies to solve problems don't seem to work anymore you can try this question. An example of a situation in which you can use the coping question is when your client says he or she is now at a zero on the scale (see the scaling question). The basic form of the question is: “How do manage to keep going?” But there are many other ways of phrasing the question. Here are some examples of coping questions:
  • What keeps you going under such difficult circumstances?
  • How do you manage to deal with such difficult situations each day?
  • What helps you to keep going even though things are really hard?
  • How can you explain to yourself how you have been able to do so well while the circumstances are so hard?
  • It is admirable how you have been able to keep on going under such difficult circumstances.... how did you do that?
  • How did you manage to cope before you gave up?
The coping question helps people in difficult situations to find new energy to keep on dealing with their problems. By using the coping question clients are helped to become aware that they in fact are managing, at least to some extent... This helps them to see that they are still able to do some things well and that their energy has not faded completely. By exploring how they do cope they can become more aware of what it is exactly that keeps them going. What is still so worthwhile for them to get out of bed each morning and to face the day? By becoming more aware of this you will see, nine times out of ten, that the motivation and hope of this person will strengthen almost immediately.

16. The continuation question: A solution-focused technique which often works well, both with individual and with organizational change is the continuation question. The question tries to identify that which does not have to change. Here some examples of how it may be phrased: “What happens in your situation that you want to continue to have happen?”, and “What doesn't have to change because it is already going well enough?” By asking this question you make clear that the client (or employee) does not have to change more than necessary and you acknowledge that there are things that are going well. Inviting clients to focus on what does not have to change has the following advantages: 1) they feel taken seriously and appreciated because the coach or therapist implies and acknowledges that there are things that are already going well, 2) after clients have made a list of things that do not have to change they usually find it easier to proceed to focus their attention to things that do need to change, 3) while they focus on what is already going well enough, clients usually get some ideas about what they might do to make progress.

17. The yes-set: The concept ‘yes-set’ refers to a technique with which the professional conducts the conversation in such a way that the client is tempted to say ‘yes’. One way of doing this by summarizing what the clients has said in the words of the client. Another way is to which the client can very easily say ‘yes’. A few examples of such questions are: ”Is it alright if I ask you a question?”, “Would you like your situation to become a bit better?” An effect of the yes-set is that clients become more suggestible and admissible. This helps them to focus more on the questions that are asked and to become imaginative in answering them. Some solution-focused professionals use the yes-set in a reversed way, too. When they notice in themselves a tendency to object to or reject something a client says they restore an openness to what client says by saying ‘yes’, or by thinking ‘yes’.

18. The prediction suggestion: A lesser known intervention in the solution-focused approach is the so-called prediction suggestion. In essence with the prediction task, the coach asks the client: "Each night, before going to bed, predict whether or not you will succeed in ............. (whatever it is the client wants to accomplish) the next day." Prediction suggestions are based on the idea that what you expect to happen is more likely to happen once the process leading up to it is in motion. While making clients set in motion the processes involved in having a better day. No matter what guess the predictor puts down, the idea that clients might have a good day is bound to cross their mind. Of course, having a good day is what they really want due to which a self-fulfilling prophecy might develop and this might prompt "better day behavior" the next day.

19. The overcoming the urge question: In the solution-focused approach it is seen as normal that people who try to change their behavior will sometimes feel the urge to fall back to old, less desired behaviors. Most people who to quit smoking will at some point feel the temptation to light another cigaret. Giving in to this urge can threaten the change process because it can negatively affect clients’ motivation to go on. A good skill to develop in change processes is the skill to overcome the urge to fall back into old behaviors. The way solution-focused practitioners may help their clients to discover and develop this skill is to suggest the following to them: "Pay attention to what you do when you overcome the temptation or urge to fall back". This type of observation task, the so-called ‘overcoming the urge question’, presupposes that clients will indeed be able to overcome their urge, at least in some situations. When they find out how they resist and overcome the temptation they can become more aware of this skill and further develop it.

20. The optimism question: The optimism question helps clients to identify reasons for optimism. Here are some ways of asking this question: "What makes you optimistic?”, “What indications do you have that you will be able to achieve ...?”, and “What small signs do see that indicate you will succeed in ....?”. Even in very difficult circumstances both clients and coaches or therapists are often surprised by the fact that still some reasons for optimism can be identified. When this happens, clients’ hopes are lifted. The optimism question makes use of the phenomenon that, often, what you focus on becomes more important. This is also the case with this question. It makes change easier by strengthening optimism.

21. Mutualizing: The solution-focused approach is often used in situations in which two partners have disagreements (conflict resolution, mediation, marital therapy, etc). One skill is particularly helpful in these kinds of situations in which people may differ in perceptions, interests and goals: mutualizing. Phil Ziegler explains the process of mutualizing as reframing issues or goals in a way that all parties can agree to. He gives an example of a mediation case: "If one parent says: 'I want the child living with me full time because that's what's best for my daughter. And the other says: ''I want our daughter living with me half time and half time with you because that would be best for her.' Then I would say, 'It's pretty clear to me that both of you want to develop a plan that will be best for your daughter--you disagree at this point about what plan would be best but you share the common goal of making the best plan for her. Can we all agree about that?'" Instead of emphasizing the different positions and goals the solution-focused practitioner mutualizes the preferred future.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Solution-Focused Scaling Questions

© 2009, Coert Visser

Steve De Shazer, an American therapist and co-developer of the solution-focused approach, once, in the nineteen-seventies, talked with a client who came for his second session. He asked the client what was better now. The client had spontaneously replied: “I’ve almost reached 10 already!” De Shazer began to play with the idea of using numbers to describe one’s situation. This started the development of the scaling question used in solution-focused therapy (Malinen, 2001). Today, scaling questions have developed into the most well known and most frequently used solution-focused techniques. Scaling questions are relatively easy to use and extremely versatile. Nowadays, many therapists, coaches and managers use them. Even many people who know little about the solution-focused approach know the scaling question.

1. Basic steps when using the scaling question
Asking the scaling question is usually done by following a few basic steps. These basic steps consist of a series of questions which are posed in a curious and encouraging way. Below, these basic steps are explained.


The following picture (Visser, 2009) visualizes all of these steps:


2. Different types of scales
There are many ways of using scaling questions. Below are the most frequent uses of the scaling question.

1. The success scale: this is the most well-known application of the scale. On this scale 10 is the desired situation and 0 is the situation in which nothing has been accomplished yet. The success to which this scale refers can be about anything that you may find relevant such as communicating more effectively, dealing more effective with problems, producing more efficiently, working more client oriented, etcetera.

2. The motivation scale: this scale is used to discuss and strengthen the motivation the client's motivation. On this scale, the 10 may be something like: “I am prepared to do a lot to achieve the goal", and 0 may be: “I am not willing to do anything for it". It may seem a bit paradoxical but by going through the basis steps of the scaling question clients often get more grip on their own motivation. They learn to regulate their own motivation and become capable of motivating themselves. When their motivation would be low they could do things that had helped them in the past to become more motivated.

3. The confidence scale: this scale is used to discuss and strengthen the client's confidence of being able to reach the desired situation. A 10 may be: “I have much confidence of being able to accomplish this” and a 0 may be: “I have no confidence whatsoever.” Just like with the motivation scale the client learns to regulate his own confidence. This can have a strong stimulating effect. When a client has little confidence that he will be able to accomplish something it makes no sense for him to take action. Once his confidence grows the threshold is lowered to take action.

4. The independence scale: an important principle in solution-focused work is that we want to keep clients from becoming dependent on coaches. The independence scale can help to establish that. This scale is used to discuss and strengthen the clients self sufficiency. A 10 may be: “I know how I can proceed with this and I don't need help anymore” and a 0 may be: “I don't know how to proceed with this and I need help." The independence scale is often used in situation in which the client has some kind of decision problem. The advantage of this scale is that it helps to keep coachings and therapies from taking longer than strictly necessary. While the problem may not be completely solved this does not have to mean that the professional help has to continue. Often, the client is able to continue independently.

3. Using scales in groups
Scaling questions are not only useful in one-on-one conversation but also in groups. Below are two examples of the use of scales in groups.

1. Group scaling question: Below is a fragment from a team session between a solution-focused team coach (TC) and a team. The coach is asked to coach the team members (TM) a few times in order to help improve team cooperation. He uses the scaling question.
    • TC: I would like to ask you whether your team, as far as you're concerned, is already exactly like you want it to be?
    • All: (Laughter) No!
    • TC: (Smiling) No problem! It would be the very first time for me to be in a team where everything was exactly like everyone wanted. Okay, I would like to explore where the team already is. Imagine a scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the situation in which things will have become like you would like them and 0 being the situation in which nothing is going like you want it to go yet. Would you write down on the little post it notes where you think the team is now on that scale?
The team members write down their score on the scale and pass them on to the team coach. The team coach asks them to take a few minutes and talk with the person sitting next to them about a recent situation in the team that went well. In the meantime the team coach calculates the average score. After a few minutes the team coach starts talking again.
    • TC: Thanks for your scores. I have calculated that the current score of the team is a 6. So things are not quite like you want them to be but you seem to be well on your way to that situation. How did you manage to reach that 6?
    • TM 1: …. It is not that we don't work for it, you know? I mean you only have to look at they way we are all sitting here and seriously participating in this process.
    • TC: Indeed, I notice that. What else has helped to reach that 6?
    • TM 2: We have all reached a point at which we want to leave the problems of the past behind us and to start looking forward, you know?
    • TC: that sound good, what else?
    • TM 3: When it really comes down to it we take care of doing a good job as a team.
The team coach goes on asking for more examples for about ten minutes and then asks a different kind of question.
    • TC: The team is now at a 6 .. Imagine that the next time we meet the team will be at a 7. What would be different in the team then?
    • TM 2: We would listen better to one another. When someone says something in the team meeting he can really explain what he wants to say and he is taken seriously.
    • TC: Fine, and what else?
    • TM 4: We would be on time for the meeting. All of us would be on time.
    • TC: I can imagine that would be good thing. What else?
    • TM 1: We support each other better when we see that a colleague is really busy. We help each other out better.
The conversation continues. For an hour the coach asks all kinds of things using the scale. For example, he asks for examples of situations in which the team has already been a bit higher on the scale. Near the end of the session, he invites each team member to think for them selves about what they can do to help the team move one small step forward on the scale. When the session is over the atmosphere is positive. The team members have found the session useful and pleasant.

2. Scale walking: This is an application of the scale which you can use in small and large groups. You ask the members of the group to imagine that one side of the room represents 0 on the scale and the other side 10. Then you ask them to think what their current position is and you tell them that this current position is represented by the letter N. Then, you invite them to come and stand on an imaginary line (somewhere halfway on the scale) and you tell them to imagine that this position is N, their current position. Then, you ask them to think about how they have been able to go from 0 to N. Next, you ask them to turn around and face the other side of the room, where 10 is. You ask them to think about what they see as they watch that part of the scale. Then, you invite them to come and stand on the 10 position and to visualize for themselves what will be different here and what they will do differently themselves. After that, the group members are asked to come and stand at their current position again and to think about which small step forward they could take. You ask them to physically take a step as soon as they know which step they will take.

Scale walking has some attractive features when working with a group. The exercise is often very lively and usually creates lots of energy and enthusiasm. Also, the exercise is very flexible. You can use it in many different types of situations. For instance, you can use it when members have individual goals. But you can also use it when there is a common them so that the scale represents a group goal (for instance 'improve customer satisfaction'). In this case, using the scale leads to a situation in which all members think about steps forward to achieving that goal.

4. Several tips for using scaling questions

4.1 What to do when the client is now at a 0?
When using scales, clients will usually say that their current position on the scale is somewhere between 0 and 10. But every now and then it happens that clients say they are now at a 0. In this case it is obvious that you can not ask them how they have been able to go from 0 to their current position because their current position is a 0. Well, what can you do in such a situation? 0 is. When a client says he is now at 0 he often wants you to understand how serious his situation is. The solution-focused coach shows understanding and acknowledges what the client says. Then, the coping question can be asked, for example like this: “How do you manage to go on in these tough circumstances?" The coping question often helps people to find new energy to cope with their difficult situation. Often, this also helps to create a new angle to continue the conversation. For instance, when the client says: “I manage to go on because I don't want to disappoint my children, the coach can build on that by asking: "How would you know your children would not have to be disappointed?”

4.2 The importance of effective scale anchors
When using scales it is important to define your scale anchors, in particular the 10-position, carefully. Scales usually work best when the 10-position is defined not in too idealistic terms (the ideal future) but rather in more realistic terms (the desired situation, the situation you would be satisfied with). Being idealistic in your definition of the 10-position has two disadvantages. The first is that you can be sure that an ideal situation will never be achieved. Problem free, ideal situations don't happen. There are always problems, challenges, and tensions, they belong to life. A second disadvantage of the 10 as ideal is that it will make the client scale the current situation lower. When the 10 represents an ideal situation the client may score the current situation as a 2, while he may score a 4 or a 5 when the 10 would be defined as the situation that would be good enough. A too idealistic 10 can demotivate.

Another aspect of choosing effective scale anchors is shown in the following example. Imagine a client wants to loose 50 pounds of weight and is helped by a solution-focused coach. When the coach would define the 10 position as the situation in which the client would have achieved the goal and would have lost the 50 pounds that could demotivate. The reason is that you could be quite sure that it would be impossible to get at the 10-position anytime soon. It would be wiser to use a different way of defining 10, for instance like this: the situation in which you would be satisfied about your eating behaviors. By defining the scale like this, it is possible for the client to move quickly to the 10-position on the scale which can be very motivating. The actual weight loss can of course be monitored on a different scale, the one in your bathroom.

4.3 Playing with scales
Often it is possible and necessary to be inventive and playful when using scales if only because clients often do that too. In a team building session, a coach once used the scale walking technique. The exercise went fine and the coach noticed how the energy in the group grew while they proceeded. At a certain point, the coach invited the members to think about which step forward they could take on the scale. He asked them to physically take a step when they knew what step it was. The team members thought for a moment and then, one after the other, took a step forward. One person thought longer than the others and eventually took a step backward instead of forward. The coach was surprised for a moment and wondered if the participant was joking. But then, the coach became curious and asked: “Hey, that is interesting... You're taking a step backward... Would you care to explain that?" The participant responded with a serious look on his face: “I am very perfectionist and by taking a step backward I want to symbolize that I am going to let things loose a bit more.” The coach responded: “Sounds good!”

5. Using scales with multiple goals
Sometimes people wonder about whether scaling questions aren't too simple to be used in complex real life situations. In complex real life situations there is often a situation when there multiple goals instead of only on goal (like improving commercial skills). Moreover, often these goals are interrelated in one way or the other, or they maybe be competing with each other. An example may be the case of a company in which one group advocated the use of proactive environmental practices. For instance, they objected to the abundant use of plastic covers around certain products. Another group in this company objected to this groups saying that the focus of the company should be achieving financial goals. The tension between these two groups grew to rather unpleasant proportions when members of both groups started accusing each other of all kinds of bad intentions and behaviors. A solution-focused coach was hired to solve this matter. To everyone's surprise, the parties were again on speaking terms within one session and fully cooperating with in two brief sessions. What happened?
The first thing the coach did was to listen carefully to both parties trying to understand their goals. After that, the coach suggested a framework in which the relationship between both goals was visualized (see below).
Then, he asked them what they considered the most desired position in this matrix. They immediately agreed that C was the preferred place to be. Then, the solution-focused coach drew a scale which looked like scale on the picture on the right. Next, he asked the group whether this scale represented their goals adequately, to which all of them could agree. Then he asked then to consider this scale and discuss with each other where they saw themselves now on this scale. Then he used all the familiar parts of the scaling questions. A bit to their own surprise the group members started to agree more and more and discovered that there were some very interesting opportunities to improve both environmental and financial performance at once. For instance, they indeed started to use less plastic covers which was not only desirable from an environmental standpoint but also lowered direct costs and production time. One member called these 'low hanging fruits'. What is interesting is that, in the second session, the group became more united. The financial people showed increasing enthusiasm for the environmental goal and vice versa.

Invitation
I invite you to try out the scaling question in a conversation or team meeting. Do let me know how it went.

References

  • Malinen, T. (2001). From Thinktank to New Therapy: The Process of Solution-Focused Theory and Practice Development. Ratkes 2, 2001 & Ratkes 3.
  • Visser, C.F. (2009). Doen wat werkt. Oplossingsgericht werken, coachen en managen. Van Duuren Management, 2e druk.

Monday, November 5, 2007

Scales: practical change tools

© 2004, Coert Visser

Scales (De Shazer, 1986) are among the simplest most appealing and accessible tools that have emerged within the practise of the solution-focused approach to change management. Scales are very easy to use and have many applications. With this article I want to give you a quick guide to using them.

How do you use scales?
Below, I will first explain the basics of using scales:

  1. Explanation of the scale: the coach explains that the scale goes from 0 to 10. 0 stands for the situation in which the problem is at its worst and 10 stands for the situation in which the problem is completely gone and the desired state has been achieved.
  2. Ask for the score: the coach then asks the coachee what his current position on that scal is (this is called ‘the platform). The coach has does not judge whether this score is ‘right’ or not.
  3. Focus on what is already there: then the coach asks how the person has already come to this position. What made this possible? Thus, the coach focuses strongly on what is already there, instead of on what has yet to be done.
  4. Visualize the desired state: then, the coach invites the coachee to describe higher points on the scale. For instance, the 10 position, in which the desired state will be completely achieved.
  5. Invite to take 1 step forward: then, the coach invites the coachee to take one small step forward.
The following picture shows all the elements mentioned above:


Case: communication
John is a project manager who is sent to a coach by his manager who thought he communicated too bluntly. After about 10 minutes, the coach begins to use the scale technique.
CONSULTANT: John, on a scale from 0 to 10, on which ‘ stands for ‘my communication at its worst’ and 10 stands for ‘ my communication at its best’, where would you say you are now?
JOHN: Mmmm... I would say about a 5 or 6... Let’s say I am at a 5½ now.
CONSULTANT: A 5½ ? That is great. So you have gone from a 0 to a 5½.. What are some of the things that helped you to do that?
JOHN: I am less impulsive than I used to be. I try to think before I say something. I have learned not to say just anything that pops into my mind. I used to do that but now I don’t do that anymore.
CONSULTANT: Aha. How do you remind yourself to think before you speak?
JOHN: I have learned that it usually makes things worse. So I just say to myself: ‘ stop, don’t say it!’
CONSULTANT: Terrific! What else has helped you achieve that 5½?
JOHN: (pause)... one thing I do is ask other people’s advice before I communicate.
CONSULTANT: Ok. How does that help?
JOHN: It’s good to learn how other people look at a situation. You get a broader perspective. It helps me to be more subtle and diplomatic in my responses.
CONSULTANT: More subtle and diplomatic?
JOHN: Yes. For instance, when I had to send an email last week I was really mad at first and my first impulse was to write a furious email. But I did not do that. I wrote an email and asked a colleague to read that before I send it. Just the thought that someone will look at my text before I send it helps me to be more aware of how to write it. After she’d read it, I changed a few more things. In the end the email was much better that the one I would have sent if I’d done it impulsively.
CONSULTANT: Ok, I can see that. Now, imagine how your communication would be at a 10. Could you describe that for me?
JOHN: Mmmm... I guess it would be more conscious and tactful.
CONSULTANT: How would I recognize that it was conscious and tactful?
JOHN: There would be no badmouthing, no attacks. There would be understanding for the other person’s view and position. Yet, it would be very clear what my view was too.
Different types of scales
In the process of change there are various types of scales one might use.
  1. Success scale: this is the scale used most frequently. It is the scale on which 0 stands for the problems at its worst and a 10 for the desired state. This ‘success’ can stand for any change topic you like (coping with stress, improving sales success, solving a conflict, and so on). Of course, you can use this scale by asking questions like: where are we now on the scale, what has helped us to get there? What would be different at the 10-position? What might be a small step forward?
  2. Motivation scale: this scale is used to talk about and strengthen the motivation of individuals or groups. On this scale a 0 might stand for: I am not prepared to do anything at all to accomplish change and a 10 stands for I am prepared to do anything to accomplish this change. Again, you can ask all the normal scaling questions like the ones we mentioned above.
  3. Confidence scale: this scale is used to talk about and strengthen the confidence of individuals or groups that they can accomplish change. A 0 might stand for: I have absolutely no confidence that I can accomplish this and a 10 might stand for: I am sure I can do this.
  4. Independence scale: this scale we use to talk about and strengthen the independence of individuals or groups in the process of change. As solution-focused consultants we do want to help clients but don’t want them to become dependent on us. On this scale a 0 might stand for: I/we cannot do this alone and desperately need outside help (from a consultant for instance). A 10 might stand for: I/we know how to proceed independently with this change process and don’t need outside help anymore.
Scales are often used in one-on-one situations like coachings and appraisal conversations. But they are also very applicable in group situations. A great exercise with scaling is scalewalking. I learned it from Paul Z. Jackson. This exercise can be done individually but is also very suitable for use in groups, small and large (we have done this exercise with groups up to 70 people). This is how it goes:
Scalewalking
You ask the members of the group to imagine that one side of the room represents zero, the other side 10. Then you ask hem to think of our current position on the scale as N and you ask all to come and stand at position N. Next, you ask them to look back at the 1 position and ask them what they see and what has brought them to position N. Then you ask them to turn around and look at position 10 and ask them how this feels. Then you invite them to come and stand at position 10 and ask them to visualize how this would be and what would be possible when they would stand here. Then they step back to their current position N and you ask them to imagine one small step forward they we might take. And then you invite them to take this step once they have thought what it was.
Now you?
The possibilities of scales are practically endless. You can invent any type of scale you find useful.
Now imagine the following scale. 0 stands for ‘Scales seem completely useless to me’ and 10 stands for ’I really feel like trying this out’. Where are you now?

References
  1. De Shazer (1986). An indirect approach to brief therapy. In S. de Shazer & R. Kral (Eds) Indirect Approaches in Therapy.
This article was published on HR.com.